Advertisements

Modern Mormonism: A Kingdom Divided?

Kate Kelly and John Dehlin

When one stake president takes a temple recommend from a member of the church for the same thing that another stake president finds no problem with, it begs the question, “Who is really in charge?” But it’s not just stake presidents; many bishops have gone one way or the other, too. For the last several months, fall out over the Ordain Women (OW) movement in the LDS Church has garnered a lot of attention, and a lot of that attention has been criticism from the orthodoxy, in the form of Op-eds, blog posts, and even press releases from the church itself. However, despite the spotlight shone so prominently on OW, LDS Church leadership remained silent. Members of the church relied wholly on vague, sometimes cryptic messages from the Church’s PR department. Many parts of those messages remained open to interpretation because no one had any way of verifying exactly where they came from.

Perhaps the biggest story, still, is the excommunication of Kate Kelly, still a fresh wound in the hearts of many. Shortly thereafter, the First Presidency did release an official statement that satisfied hosts of the orthodoxy, but a simple skimming of that statement reveals that it merely reiterates the status quo. It provides no definitive answer to OW’s request that LDS leaders petition the Lord, neither does it indicate whether said leaders have petitioned the Lord.

Since Kate Kelly’s excommunication, local church leadership has been extremely active in many parts of the USA and the rest of the world. Many women and men in the church have faced disciplinary actions, and I personally know a half dozen people whose leaders, bishops and stake presidents, have taken away their temple recommends, the standard of worthiness and good spiritual standing in the LDS Church. I have heard stories of more than a dozen others who have faced the same penalty or another. Also, I know people whose leaders have chosen to excommunicate them and others who felt compelled to resign from the church. A number of these people I consider dear friends. The effect of any type of church discipline in nearly every one of these cases has been the pushing of those members away. Many have chosen inactivity at the very least because no one wants to go to church every week and see the man who is holding her or his spirituality hostage.

So does God change or do men?

So what exactly is happening at the local level of the LDS Church? Is there a great purge sweeping the nation, the world, under the direction of the central church leadership in an attempt to rid the church of all these apostates? While at first glance this appears obvious, a closer look reveals a divided kingdom. In addition to all that church discipline against supporters of OW, even some who have never shown public support, many other members, some of whom I know, have retained their temple recommends despite their outspoken support of OW, even having OW profiles on the OW website. We expect that leaders on both sides diligently prayed and sought guidance in these matters, yet some feel compelled to remove church blessings, even without any clear cause in some cases, while others have no desire to do so and are even happy to renew temple recommends. The question this begs, one which I know will stir controversy (and I can already see the explanations and justifications people are likely to bombard me with), “Who is wrong?” Which of these leaders are making mistakes?

Advertisements

Comments

  1. I think that this question is not asked enough. It deserves serious consideration.

    • Johnny Wycliffe says:

      Thanks, Juliathepoet, people never take the time to think about the fact that there are literally thousands of local leaders (bishops and stake presidents). Someone is going to do something wrong at some point. More realistically, hundreds are going to do many things wrong at many different times.

  2. Great post, I couldn’t agree more. The lack of consistency at the local level of leadership is really concerning to me, and the message I’ve received from all of this hooplah is that if I don’t like that I can’t have the priesthood, then I should just leave. But that contradicts the Church’s claim that it is indeed the church of Christ, whom I know would never shew anyone away. Following your blog, and can’t wait to read more! Care to check out my site? DownWithTheNorm.com

    M.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: